I just want to go back to the issue of the next generation of 5G networks, which are still being researched, and the metaphor that Ms. Dabrusin brought up. They are cardboard boxes that an armoured truck is driving between people, but I think they're also devices. In the last meeting we had an interesting conversation about the number of devices that are now going to be in play because of the next generation networks and the speed capability—things like robots being involved in surgery and the possibilities for agriculture with drones.
I'll start with HackerOne, then go to Mr. Waterhouse as well.
I was told that price isn't the only consideration. As the market attempts to develop affordable devices for things such as smart homes and all of the other uses you can think of, is there any concern about a race to the bottom, where security will be sacrificed? You could have the Fort Knox of networks, but ultimately, if people have crappy firmware—if you'll forgive the expression—or lousy devices, the whole thing could be for naught.
Is that a concern? How would we address it?