The chair, reluctantly, rules that NDP-2 is inadmissible, therefore making NDP-1 null.
I do take note of the arguments that you've put forward, which I think, frankly, are good arguments and consistent with the evidence, but the interpretation on the scope of the bill is the interpretation on the scope of the bill. There are certain places that even well-intentioned legislators can't go.
With that, the chair is challenged. I think that's a straight-up, straight-down vote.
Would you like a recorded vote?