Each one of the security and intelligence operations of the government has some amount of review apparatus attached to it now. In the case of CBSA, it does not have a mechanism to review specific officer conduct and complaints from the public about that conduct. That's a clear gap in the process that we intend to fill, and we're considering a variety of tools for doing that. It may be a body like the civilian review committee that applies to the RCMP. Others have suggested that we shouldn't have a separate review body for each one of these agencies, but some kind of comprehensive review body that can examine all of them together, and thereby cross-fertilize the experience, if you will. We're looking at all of the alternatives as to what would be the best arrangement. Senator Moore, in the other place, has come up with the idea of an inspector general for the CBSA. That's one of the ideas that will be taken into account.
As we have developed the concept of the overarching committee of parliamentarians, it has become obvious that there are some gaps, like this one in relation to the CBSA, that will need to be filled. We'll have to think through very carefully the relationship between the existing review bodies, or some new configuration of those review bodies, and the committee of parliamentarians. How does it all fit together? The objective here is not to have three or four different review bodies all examining the same thing, wasting time and effort, and not doing the job that Canadians would expect them to do, but in fact to make sure that they work efficiently together and comprehensively cover the waterfront so there are no gaps in the process. We don't want to create redundancies where they're all doing the same thing over and over again.