I can go through some of the other measures the other jurisdictions had in place when they moved from selective breath testing to random breath testing. New Zealand, for example, when it implemented random breath testing in 1993, increased their enforcement, so that they had 1.5 million breath tests annually in a country of 2.3 million registered vehicles. That's a massive number of breath tests. That year, 7 in 10 licensed drivers were pulled over.
To increase that level of enforcement would send an incredibly strong message of denunciation. It would have an incredibly powerful impact as a deterrent, regardless of whether you have selective breath testing or random breath testing. Imagine what a powerful symbol that would send across the country.
Similarly, Ireland has drastically increased enforcement and they had massive publicity campaigns. They lowered alcohol regulatory requirements in New Zealand. In Australia, they said that at the very minimum, one in three drivers needs to be pulled over annually, ideally, one out of two.
Those are all measures that are within our power, within the existing legislative regime, that have had enormous impacts in other countries. They would have some of the denunciation impacts that you are very concerned about as I am.