I think the Arar commission inquiry talked about the way in which oversight bodies talk to each other. It also talked about the need for additional review bodies. One of the questions I think you need to address is whether you go with what some people have called a “super SIRC” or with alternative and specific bodies that cover particular institutions. My preference is the latter. I think one needs to address the effectiveness of SIRC.
One of the things that came out of—and it's been a long-standing concern of mine—the five-year review process, was that we found that SIRC's basic investitures and reporting processes didn't satisfy basic standards. It wasn't adequate. There is a need, I think, to learn from past experience, to learn from comparative experience.