There are two key ones that I would recommend. First of all, as was stated before, to appeal the decision of the minister you have to establish that the minister was unreasonable. It shouldn't be unreasonableness. What it should be is he or she was correct. It's too important in terms of the intrusive power it has on the citizen. The second improvement I would recommend is that much of the hearing on the appeal will be heard in secret. You're going to have the government lawyer there and you're not going to have anybody representing the individual. In Bill C-51, if you're going to have a no-fly list, I would have a provision that says there is a special advocate who will be in the hearing representing the interests of the person whose name is on the no-fly list, so at least we have some kind of an adversarial debate within the secret hearings of the Federal Court. That's not there now. That should be there.
On October 20th, 2016. See this statement in context.