Yes.
Also, to go back to your colleague's prior question, one of the reasons I think we can jog is that we have all this expertise with SIRC and the CSE commissioner.
One of my concerns is that if you make the interactions between the new committee and those existing review bodies more sticky than they have to be, you're actually going to, potentially, make both worse.
For example, I think a first task of the secretariat should be to make all of the classified reports—there are 100 classified reports by SIRC and the CSE commissioner—part of a library that parliamentarians and a security-cleared secretariat can access and can use to hold ministers to account for the way they respond to that.
One of my worries is that by making the triple lock very complicated, you're going to get into a situation where the lawyers are going to tell you, “It would be nice to have that study from SIRC, but we're not really sure.”
As you know, Mr. Clement, lawyers tend to be risk averse. They tend to be risk averse when they're looking at the Security of Information Act with its penalties and so forth.
I think you need to get it right now, because it is going to be more difficult to fix three or five years down the road.