I think redaction would be acceptable if the information would jeopardize an operation of one of the security agencies, such as CSIS or the Canadian military.
Let me, Mr. Miller, give you the flip side of that. What information that has been redacted in the past should not have been redacted and was found by Justice Noel?
There were 2,000 words in the Arar commission case. About 1,000 were eventually released, and most of those released related to the fact that the words “a foreign agency” had been used, whereas in fact the foreign agency involved was the CIA. It was the identification of the CIA or the FBI that Justice O'Connor wanted the public to know about, and their involvement in this whole operation in Canada, which the Prime Minister's Office had sought to excise or redact because it would be embarrassing to Canada to embarrass our neighbours to the south, because the CIA said they never wanted to see their name appear in a Canadian public document.
Justice in this situation was served, because the information came out, and incidentally, our relationship with the United States and the CIA didn't change.