That's a good question, and let me begin with our unfettered access to information, minus cabinet confidence. I always have to say that. We tend to do review of past operations, or historical review, and that does not hamper a typical ongoing operation of those sorts of things. We're looking retrospectively. We're looking in the past.
In the legislation there are potentially limits on information that the committee of parliamentarians can get. I don't necessarily feel comfortable in commenting on that, other than saying an accountability system is more than one organization. You have ministerial accountability; you have Michel Coulombe's accountability as the head of CSIS; you have our position in accountability, as you would have potentially the committee of parliamentarians. If you look at it as a complete framework, I think you're pretty well covered.