Mr. Fadden, I'm going to start with you. I want to follow up on the exchange you had with Mr. Erskine-Smith.
As you said, public confidence is key. To clarify your answer to Mr. Erskine-Smith, just imagine a scenario in which a foreign terrorist carries out an attack in Canada. We have a detailed investigation, which is called for, into the failures or the gaps that allowed the incident to occur. SIRC could examine CSIS's conduct, but only this new committee could look at the Canada Border Services Agency.
Is it your testimony, then, that clauses 14 and 16 could undermine the committee's ability to conduct a fulsome and detached operational review to the standard necessary for public confidence?