I want to hear your thoughts on another interesting point as well. Something we've heard from other witnesses is how some of the limitations that exist currently in the bill would prevent the review of operations that took place rather a long time ago but are ongoing and that really require the kind of review that Parliament needs, such as Afghan detainees or Air India.
Perhaps I could I have your thoughts on that, given your experience on Air India in particular. How important is it that even though there are certain ongoing elements of those investigations, the committee does need to get access to that information to do its work?