In regard to the concerns we have in terms of information sharing, I think a number of the concerns were raised by Mr. Fadden as well. The committee itself would presumably be trained and take quite seriously the practices of security clearances in terms of saying that they would only request or want information on a need-to-know basis. The question is whether or not a committee can be effective when there is a veto power by the ministers.
What would be a much more effective process would be to say that if the minister has concerns that information shouldn't be shared with the committee, because of the impact on allies or because of the impact on ongoing operations or whatever the situation might be, those concerns can be communicated to the committee as to why the committee doesn't need to know these things or does not need to know them right now or at this particular or with respect to the study they're doing—