I just want to tease out some of your testimony as well. You said at one point that the committee obviously will be operating mostly in secret, almost exclusively in many cases, but that the public has to have confidence that the committee will do the job. It struck me that this is a good construction of it. The public is not going to know what the committee is doing most of the time. It will be issuing reports. At that point, there will be something public. In terms of month to month, or what have you, the veil cannot be pierced.
The structure of the committee, or the architecture of the committee, to use your terminology, is very important. If the public doesn't have confidence in it being a true representation of the public interest, then there's really not much point in having the committee. I don't mean to put words in your mouth, but is that what you meant when you uttered that phrase?