Monsieur Portelance talked about how detailed reviews would not necessarily be the purview of this committee. You'd have the review agencies, but this would have a different kind of function.
Again, I'm groping in the dark a bit, because of course this doesn't exist, and we've never been part of the U.S., U.K., or Australian experience on this. My question is, if it isn't detailed review—and I get that—and if it isn't operational review in real time—and I get that too—how do we make this substantive and useful?