We had the government representatives before us talking about a first step and improving this over time. I've been trying to find some middle path myself. If we don't delete all of clause 14, other than paragraph 14(a), and we don't delete all of clause 16, what does that middle ground look like?
I actually took your previous testimony at the privacy committee at heart about the importance of discretionary exemptions. If we were to move paragraphs 14(b) to 14(g), currently automatic exemptions, into clause 16, which would make them discretionary, and also require the additional criterion of “injurious to national security”—and I recognize you have issues with that as well, and you want judicial review—would that strike a better balance, in your view?