I think that's a very easy fix in the legislation.
To say meetings are to be held in private.... The bill should probably have the open court principle and open by default in mind and say that meetings should be held in public except in those.... I think it's more of a perception as well for the functioning of the committee and the transparency around the committee.
I think that's quite an easy fix. It's a question of giving the public the perception that whatever can be conducted in public will be. I think it's just a reversal of language here.