By answering Mr. Erskine-Smith's questions, you've in effect eased the burden on the mover of the amendment to whom we look for some guidance as to what he or she intends to capture by way of the subamendment.
Having gotten an example or two and understanding the parameters intended by the word “activity” as opposed to “operations” a little more, at the end of the day the rationale for the discretion is to ensure that information that is potentially injurious to national security is not shared. Am I right about that?