No. It's just words being added, one word here, one word.... Each one is essentially a word. There's one that might be seven words.
If members want to follow along, I'll keep Mr. Mendicino's amendment in front of me, and then we can read along.
The overarching narrative of the four subamendments is adding clarity to the language, in keeping with some of the concerns we've raised in our discussion of the powers that are conferred on the minister.
With that in mind, the first subamendment I would move is to part (a) of Mr. Mendicino's amendment. After the word “ongoing”, we would add the word “operational”, to read: “to national security or intelligence, unless the activity is an ongoing operational activity and the appropriate Minister determines that the review would”.
Mr. Chair, if I may offer an explanation for this, it is simply that it avoids a situation such as with Air India, about which it could be argued that it's an ongoing activity but not an operational one. It allows the committee the latitude, in that kind of instance.
I'll wait for your cue to move on, or do you want me to...?