Thanks, Chair.
I would argue that while we are drafting legislation for this power to be there and there is no judicial review and it's a discretionary power for a minister, I think the word is important, because it deals with the political costs attached to using this discretionary power. The fact is that we have a committee of parliamentarians, and when the minister is exercising this power, there is a cost attached to that.
Given, as has been stated numerous times and as I just said, that there's no judicial review, I'm less concerned about how a judge interprets “operation” and more concerned about how a minister interprets it and how the committee will receive that decision. It certainly changes the dynamics there, and it's a dynamic that's important to be mindful of in the drafting of this legislation, given that we want to give the minister these powers.