I'm having a hard time understanding why we're objecting to changing a word because we don't know how it's defined, but we're referring to undefined discretion of the minister and using powers sparingly. I don't feel that those two thoughts jibe together.
If we're afraid of the definition of the word and its vagueness, we should also be afraid of the vagueness on how often the power should be used, because it's being referred to but it's nowhere written in the bill.