Just in response to that, I don't want to get into the weeds here, but I did say I would support the amendment. The point I'm trying to make is...I'm debating our amendment and I feel that I'm not going to fall into this trap, in supporting Mr. Erskine-Smith's amendments, of not making a point that for us is the key to this issue.
The problem is when we're moving.... We're going to try to improve the bill, but when you want full access, it's difficult to think of what a compromise could be. All we're asking is the same thing that Joyce Murray proposed, the same thing Hugh Segal proposed, and the same thing as the other review bodies.