I wouldn't identify a use or abuse of the law that's been a flagrant concern to us, but I think it still could be improved, so we are making some suggestions.
I take the point of my colleagues that a law can be discriminatorily enforced, and we have to guard against that, but simply because there is a potential for abuse of a law—any law—doesn't mean we shouldn't have that law. I think we have to look at the law to see if it serves a purpose when it's functioning properly. Certainly this law, when it is functioning properly, does serve a purpose.