Nathaniel Erskine-Smith at the Public Safety and National Security Committee

On December 5th, 2017. See this statement in context.

December 5th, 2017 / 9:25 a.m.

Liberal

Nathaniel Erskine-Smith Liberal Beaches—East York, ON

Thanks very much.

Thank you to you both for your testimony.

Ms. Carvin, you mentioned that in the total architecture of review you still had some concerns about efficacy. You mentioned Professor Forcese a few times. In a paper that he and Kent Roach wrote they talk about this three-legged stool and there is a parliamentarian committee on efficacy, there's a super-SIRC for propriety review, and then they talk about an independent monitor of national security law built on the U.K. and Australian model.

When we look at Bill C-59 and Bill C-22 together, do you see that largely meeting the overall review architecture?

See context to find out what was said next.