Yes, I mean that the proposal taken from section 10 of the U.K. Terrorism Act 2000 is simply to allow a group that thinks it is wrongly listed to be able to challenge that without the very act of challenge being the subject of a charge of, say, financing a terrorist group.
More generally, listing is something we haven't really relied upon because most of the terrorism prosecutions we've had have not been affiliated with al Qaeda or Daesh central, but have been a bunch of guys, and a bunch of guys—under our Criminal Code—can themselves be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in appropriate cases to be their own terrorist group.
Again, the threat environment rapidly changes. This is why we need ongoing reviews of these laws. This is why I recommended moving up the six-year review of this act to at least a four-year review, because we need to figure out what terrorism tools we need, including new terrorism tools, and maybe what old terrorism tools are unnecessary, in part because of the changing threat environment.