For me to properly understand, you're suggesting that the language in the former Bill C-51 might actually serve national security interests better than the proposed language in Bill C-59. Is that correct?
February 8th, 2018 / 12:30 p.m.
Conservative
Glen Motz Conservative Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, AB
For me to properly understand, you're suggesting that the language in the former Bill C-51 might actually serve national security interests better than the proposed language in Bill C-59. Is that correct?
See context to find out what was said next.