This is for both of you, and for you, Professor Nesbitt, as well.
I'd like your view on the following. In part 5 of this bill, in subclause 115(4), it says:
...[any form of] advocacy, protest, dissent or artistic expression is not an activity that undermines the security of Canada...
Now, is there a risk that including this language may potentially present loopholes that the authors of the bill may not have considered at the time and that may, indeed, present a risk to the security of Canada and Canadians?