All right. Thank you.
When it comes to information acquired incidentally, is there any notion of why that would be retained? Right now, I think, it's in proposed subsection 24(4), which talks about information acquired incidentally through the research that's done. Is there any reason that you would retain that information and not just put it back, throw the fish back in the water, if that's happening?
I'm not clear on the authorizations when it comes to proposed section 24. I'm pretty clear on the authorizations for information acquired incidentally for datasets with CSIS, but I'm less so on part 3.