It's one of the challenges of people who read legislation. It's how the law is applied and defined by our courts and by the police.
The important work of protecting Canada, the work we do globally and domestically in dealing with terrorist activity, is critically important, but as well in this country, there is a protected right in the Constitution for lawful, peaceful protest. When that protest becomes unlawful, as can be the case either in violation of an injunction or as a result of specific criminal activity, our officials don't make the immediate nexus to terrorism in criminal activity.
Our officials are well versed in their responsibilities, and the determination as to what conduct might constitute a specific criminal offence is not something that I as a minister of government would direct. That's a determination made under the individual discretion of the police of jurisdiction in exercising their responsibilities to conduct investigation and the responsibilities of prosecutors of jurisdiction.
I would not leap to that determination but leave it to the police and to our prosecutors to determine whether or not any conduct meets a threshold of that level of criminality.