That's actually a great question that I was really hoping someone would ask me.
It wasn't an easy decision to name countries because it immediately draws the attention from all the other aspects of the report to the four countries named. However, in reality, we, the Government Canada, had called out.... At some point, we had attributed malicious cyber activity to one of these four, or we joined our allies in doing so. So they were the logical four. They are also the four that demonstrated the capabilities that we mentioned in terms of the risk to Canada. We thought that, well, on one hand, it draws the attention away from some of the things we would like to talk about, such as how is it very easy for a fifth country and a sixth country to appear on that list. However, on the other hand, we need to acknowledge the fact that these four countries are out there and represent significant strategic risk to Canada with their capabilities and what they are able to do.
That was some of the discussion, but one of the things I've said is that the decision to name is more from a cybersecurity perspective. We certainly support this, but it is really in alignment with foreign affairs and foreign policy.