Thank you.
You are right that the transparency of the findings, recommendations and results is critical. When the joint board first started its investigation, the public safety minister said, “In the interests of transparency and justice for Ms. Levesque's family we have also committed to making the findings and any recommendations public”. Much of this report is redacted currently, so how does that serve the aim of transparency that both you and the Minister of Public Safety have rightfully cited? Will there be any adjustments made to the amount of information that has been redacted?