I'm obviously not in favour of that. The situation in prisons, as a recent study shows, is that many of the inmates are over-assessed for risk at the beginning in a biased manner. Black individuals and indigenous people are over-assessed, don't get access to programs and don't get access to parole as a result of being put in maximum institutions. There are a lot of problems that need to be solved.
In this case, I'm a little concerned that if the public sees that a four out of five chance or a 20% chance of reoffending is considered a criterion, then that certainly means.... I don't think we should keep the other four in because one might offend, but surely a better system than that type of risk assessment is needed. Don't you agree?