Well, I think they would agree that the nature of foreign interference is evolving. I think they would agree that the seriousness of the threats is becoming better known. We tried to describe those threats throughout that chapter, that review. We focused on the core community members and actors. We laid out as well what the community is already doing.
To use the language I used in the press conference, we believe we have to up our game on foreign interference. That is why we pointed to the most obviously successful, we think, reaction in a Five Eyes partner country to deal with foreign interference. That is the example of what's taking place in Australia. There are many reasons set out for that in the report as well.
We hope readers come to the conclusion that they understand better now what is going on and what other countries are doing and how they're dealing with it. I wouldn't say we're necessarily late to the game. I think the question of foreign interference is one that most countries are struggling with. We laid out the facts and the evidence based on classified information as best we could. Of course, a lot of it has been redacted. Now we're calling on the government to bring a much more centralized interdepartmental and intergovernmental approach, and at the same time inform Canadians and inform parliamentarians.