Do you feel that the mechanism that currently exists...? This bill has mechanisms similar to what we've seen—you know, a five-year review—but the language is slightly different. The language in this bill says “must”, but the language in previous legislation says the committee “is to”. I'm not sure that gives any more clarity on whether or not committees will be mandated. It will be up to, as you said, whether or not the government at the time places a high priority on it. Clearly, this is a high priority, and it's been something that's been neglected for far too long in this country.
Would you recommend expediting those reviews to less than five years? Also, would you recommend language that makes it stronger and puts the emphasis on this needing to take priority at the same level as legislation, which usually takes priority at committees?