I'm going to start by responding to the question concerning the duty to warn people when their lives are in danger.
The role of the RCMP isn't necessarily to provide these people with protection, but rather to make them aware of the threat. I come back to the idea that the threat is imminent and credible. We're going to make some suggestions. For example, we might suggest that those individuals vary their daily routine. We might also provide them with some cybersecurity tips, if necessary. There is no one-size-fits-all approach here. However, we're trying to make people aware that they need to change their routines.
In response to the second part of the question, I'd say that it would be better to ask CSIS. As you just said, the RCMP will commit to intervening in foreign interference when a crime is committed. As to whether we can disclose information indicating that person xand person y met, for example, I believe that CSIS would be best placed to implement mitigation measures or meet with the individuals in question.
If there's any time remaining, I would ask Mr. Rogers to provide more clarification.