Chair, I'm rereading this in support of my colleague's amendments, but one thing that is confusing to me and might be confusing to Canadians when they read this study is the final line after “include in this study the following urgent issues in relation to firearms” which reads “address the causes of youth gang involvement, programs that prevent recruitment and retention and diversion”.
I don't think we're talking about programs that are preventing diversion. It seems kind of confusing there. We should be talking about programs that are encouraging diversion. The wording is confusing, because it says that we're reviewing programs that prevent diversion, but we should be looking at programs that encourage it, unless I'm mistaken on the purpose of the term “diversion”. It's kind of unclear. Maybe that could use some clearer wording as well.