I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.
There are two things. First, Ms. Dancho is not getting interpretation, but I have a question.
Has someone challenged the chair's decision? If not, we should just go back to the clause that I've introduced. If there's no challenge of the chair, which I haven't heard yet, then we should get back to clause-by-clause and the amendment.
I'm sorry that someone can't participate virtually, but if the interpretation is not coming through, we can't just continue to take part. If there's no challenge to the chair, then we should just move on, Mr. Chair.