The magazine issue is a completely separate issue, in my opinion. Unfortunately, we don't actually have clarity, and the first thing we should be getting clarity on before we discuss any of these legislative changes is the one that actually deals with magazines. All we have right now is what we currently have in regulation, plus what the minister has said they're going to do. This means that I'm now guessing, as a parliamentarian, what that magazine legislative change or regulatory change might look like.
Remington are now getting back into the business. They've made announcements saying that they're going to create a new line of firearms. Hypothetically speaking, I'm assuming they're not going to reinvent the wheel. Let's say they create a model 800, with small design changes. It's not the 742, it's not the 7400 and it's not the 750. Let's just give it a number; let's say it's the 800, a semi-automatic rifle. They're going to manufacture a four-round magazine, a 10-round magazine and a 20-round magazine and introduce it to the marketplace.
I'd like your interpretation of this piece of legislation, if it came to pass into law, for a Remington 800, if that's what they decide to call it, designed and manufactured after this becomes law, if they come to the marketplace with that and they get the patent after this becomes law. That Remington 800 now comes with a four-shot magazine, a 10-shot magazine and a 20-shot magazine, because it will probably be interoperable on the platforms, as almost the whole 700 platform is. What would be your interpretation? Would it be your advice and recommendation, to either an order in council or whatever the process may be, that this firearm, the Remington 800, be prohibited?