On a point of order, Chair, the amendment we're talking about is still looking at having “A member of the immediate family of a person or a person who resides with that person” being able to go to court. The Conservatives are not talking about deleting the clause. They're talking about limiting who can, and what they're doing is ensuring that an ex-partner of someone who abuses them or stalks them is not able to take advantage of red flag.
I think Mr. Motz needs to make up his mind. Either he wants to delete it or he's going to talk about CPC-3, which is still allowing a member of the immediate family to go to court to get the red flag, so it is actually keeping red flag, in spite of what he's saying.
I know that he says he's not filibustering, but he's talking about two different things. If he wants to keep to CPC-3 and make it relevant to what we're actually debating, that would be really helpful.