It's a well-established rule of committees that if a motion is on the matter at hand, notice is not required. Any motion can be moved on the matter at hand, provided there is not another motion on the floor. There was no other motion on the floor. The matter at hand was what it was, and I moved a motion in accordance with that matter at hand.
Furthermore, there is no direct conflict with the motion that was previously adjourned. Even so, you can propose to resume consideration of a previously adjourned motion, provided that something has happened in between.
Anyway, that's not what my motion was.
I wonder if the clerk can provide more clarity on the issue of “matter at hand” to the committee. That might be helpful for Ms. O'Connell in understanding how these things are typically adjudicated.