Thank you, so the intent here is to ensure that the commission has the necessary discretion.
Does the language in NDP-34—and feel free to invite your colleagues in as well—take away some of the discretion that I think is being suggested through the amendment by adding the “seriously compromise an ongoing investigation”, whereas the other amendment simply says “may”?
Is there a substantive difference in terms of how that would be interpreted and the impact that would have when this discretion is utilized?