Okay. It could be the case, then, in advance of or after an investigation is done at the other body....
I would be curious to know Mr. Julian's response to this, because it seems the presentation of this was framed as providing a greater degree of flexibility. It seems to provide, in that particular sense, less flexibility.
Regarding the reference to “seriously compromise”, is that sort of descriptor defined somewhere in the legislation or in the Criminal Code, or is it subject to interpretation? What constitutes a serious compromise or a compromise that's not so serious?