Perhaps I can clarify that as well. My apologies if, during my opening statement, I indicated otherwise. Adherence isn't necessarily the encouragement that we would be offering. It's more that a number of aspects of Bill C-26 are much more far-reaching than established international standards for mature cybersecurity regimes, of our allies in particular.
It's not necessarily adherence to them, but more a recognition that we don't necessarily need to go beyond what they're already working towards in their private and public partnership and enablement of the industry.
I hope that gives a little bit of clarification. It's not necessarily an alignment to international standards, but a “not going farther than”, as we try to work together to bolster our critical infrastructure.