Yes, that's a function of the absence of publicity requirements with respect to the orders themselves, as well as the absence of any notice obligation set out under Bill C-26.
We've recommended in our brief that the constraints on secrecy must be defined and strictly curtailed to what is absolutely necessary. Language exists in the bill to support that amendment, as well as the need for notice obligations, which is an essential function for review mechanisms that would be necessary for this level of collection and sharing power, of course.