Yes. In the situation where an individual or institution would seek to challenge the collection powers or orders under Bill C-26, there is a judicial review mechanism that's available. There are other complaint proceedings that are available in law outside of the scope of Bill C-26.
In this case, it contemplates secret evidence. In this case, there is some language that is included. Unlike the minister's discretion to keep secret the orders themselves—and that discretion doesn't appear to have any limits—there is some language in the bill at least with respect to the secret evidence proceedings. However, we've recommended that it be tightened and aligned with that which is set out in the Canada Evidence Act, because there's no justification for diluting that requirement or the court's ability to balance the public interest in disclosure in contrast to the government's interest in confidentiality. That's essential, in our view, with respect to the constitutionality of the scheme.