What I find rather interesting is that this has been on the books since June 2022, so we're 20 months into this, and now we want to rush through a process that we have heard many witnesses.... We also have significant recommendations to make in clause-by-clause to go through and fix this, and it's the responsibility of this committee to do that.
I don't know why there is the rush of an extra day or week or two to go through this. I don't support the extra length of meetings. We have other responsibilities as well, so I definitely don't support the need to sit extra.
I think we should get at the study on auto. When we're done with our recommendations and have them submitted, then we can go back and work on the clause-by-clause of Bill C-26. That, for sure, is going to take a lot longer than a couple of meetings of extended time.