I thank the member for his question, Mr. Chair.
As I understand the question, it's about the difference between the PRRA process and what would be considered at the Immigration and Refugee Board.
The PRRA process, as I explained earlier, is one that is robust and considers many of the same factors that are considered in an IRB decision. It considers the fear of persecution and the risk of refoulement impacts that someone would be subjected to if they were returned to their country of origin.
With respect to the Federal Court, the PRRA process has been in place for a number of years and is quite robust. It has been defended in that way and has stood up to those types of challenges. In that respect, yes, the PRRA process is considered sufficient in this case.