My questions are for Christopher Hamilton and Tara Lang.
Some criticism has been levelled at portions of the bill that deal with immigration. I would like to give you an opportunity to respond to that criticism, since the committee will not be hearing from witnesses on that subject.
First, Mr. Hamilton, I heard you say that the pre-removal risk assessment process is robust, and I take your word for it. However, it is undeniable that procedural fairness in this assessment is not the same as at the Immigration and Refugee Board. There is some concern that this could lead to more challenges in Federal Court. The intent of the bill is to avoid bogging down the Federal Court.
What is your assessment of that issue?