I understand that it’s subject to judicial review. Perhaps I wasn’t very clear, and so I’ll rephrase my question.
Generally speaking, isn’t there a basis to make sure there’s a mechanism that would hold your department accountable to an independent organization? I’m not sure what organization that would be, but that’s something that can be looked into. That said, while I’ll not go as far as to say that waiting for a citizen to apply for judicial review is negligent, I don’t think it’s very proactive. It’s possible to be more proactive and to provide a report annually or every five or two years. The details can be fleshed out.
In short, did you feel that it was not useful to include a mechanism to track these orders in the bill?