Thank you, Minister.
To answer your question, there was an administrative error that was corrected. The other substantive difference is because of Bill C-70, which adopted a secure administrative review procedure to allow—in the context of judicial reviews—a special process to consider confidential information and to appoint special councils to assess the intelligence that might be used in an administrative proceeding.
SARP, as we refer to it, replaced the provisions in Bill C-26 that referenced a specific process. Now SARP applies to almost all judicial reviews, as opposed to piecemeal per legislation. That was the real substantive change.