Okay.
Is there any further debate? It doesn't look like it.
The clerk has informed me that it is theoretically possible to proceed as planned with the clause‑by‑clause consideration of the bill on Tuesday, except that it will place an additional burden on the clerk, parliamentary analysts and the other people who have to speak to the amendments. It will also place an additional burden on members, who will have a little less time to study the amendments and prepare for Tuesday's meeting. However, if this additional burden doesn't bother the members, it is up to them to decide.
Is everyone in favour of Mrs. DeBellefeuille's motion?
(Motion agreed to)